Sorry but this is still being formatted. Please come back soon. This topic is so very important
Origin of DARVO as a Society Coping Mechanism
The Four-Factor Model Explaining an Evolving Society
When covid19.net.nz was first launched, the focus was clear: investigate the truth behind SARS-CoV-2. But as the pandemic unfolded, we found ourselves asking deeper questions—not just about the virus, but about the psychology of society itself.- Why were truths suppressed (and still are)?
- Why were people divided by fear(and still are)?
- Why did systems designed to protect us begin to punish dissent?
The answers weren’t just medical or political. They were psychological.
Through thousands of hours of research, real-life case analysis, and personal reflection, we arrived at a deeper diagnosis:
It includes:
Based on this, every person exists as a 4-letter polarity code
Examples:
Through thousands of hours of research, real-life case analysis, and personal reflection, we arrived at a deeper diagnosis:
It’s not the virus that broke us—it’s the psychological structures we built before it arrived.
What you are about to read is the result of that journey.It includes:
- A groundbreaking Four-Factor Model for understanding gender, identity, trauma, and social collapse
- The decoding of DARVO—a defense mechanism that evolved into an institutional psychosis
- Case studies from the personal to the global: from courtrooms to COVID, and even into the minds of abusers and leaders
🔍 The Four-Factor Polarity Model
Humans identify identity through four traits (axes):- Hormonal Influence – Dominant sex hormones during development creates Male and Femal
- Biological Structure – Body shape, organs, and reproductive role
- Cognitive Focus – Two types: Provision (Masculin) vs. Nurture (Feminim) orientation
- Emotional Cycle – Consistent (Male) vs. Rhythmic/Reactive (Female)
Based on this, every person exists as a 4-letter polarity code
Examples:
1: A fully aligned female (F-F-F-F)
Body = Female
Mind = Female
Emotion = Female
Logic = Female
2: A fully aligned male (M-M-M-M)
Body = Male
Mind = Male
Emotion = Male
Logic = Male
3: Male + Female (M-F-F-M)
Body = Male
Mind = Female
Emotion = Female
Logic = Male
4: Female + Male (F-M-M-F)
Body = Female
Mind = Male
Emotion = Male
Logic = Female
Imagine how each of these persoanlities woul differe in their approach to a sdbject.
They cannot see the world the same way without carful training.
Deny. Attack. Reverse Victim and Offender.
It is a technique used to confuse the subject and win any argumnent. It is used by children to avoid blame:
Mum: "Did you break the pot?"
Child: "No it was Him!"
Body = Female
Mind = Female
Emotion = Female
Logic = Female
2: A fully aligned male (M-M-M-M)
Body = Male
Mind = Male
Emotion = Male
Logic = Male
3: Male + Female (M-F-F-M)
Body = Male
Mind = Female
Emotion = Female
Logic = Male
4: Female + Male (F-M-M-F)
Body = Female
Mind = Male
Emotion = Male
Logic = Female
Imagine how each of these persoanlities woul differe in their approach to a sdbject.
They cannot see the world the same way without carful training.
🔥 DARVO – A Natural Defense, Turned Global Weapon
DARVO is an acknonym that stands for :Deny. Attack. Reverse Victim and Offender.
It is a technique used to confuse the subject and win any argumnent. It is used by children to avoid blame:
Mum: "Did you break the pot?"
Child: "No it was Him!"
and as simple as that, a psychological technique avoids the pain of ownership and deflects the problem.
As we progress from childhood to adulthood, the same technique is used but develops into a more sophysticated story and has more impact.
"It's Safe And Effective and anyone who tells you elsewise is a liar!"
"Unlock the things you love..."
The people using the technique don't even know they are usining it. For them it has becoem a way of life as they [progrtess into positions of power and influence. Facts are no longer impprtant. Only that they win every argument maters."
DARVO was originally a personal trauma response, but in our evolving society, DARVO has become a mass psychosis model, where a person—or institution—constructs a false self to avoid pain, truth, or accusation. In doing so, they create a false society. The result?
DARVO was originally a personal trauma response, but in our evolving society, DARVO has become a mass psychosis model, where a person—or institution—constructs a false self to avoid pain, truth, or accusation. In doing so, they create a false society. The result?
- Deny wrongdoing
- Attack the truth-bearer
- Claim to be the victim
Let's get this right; abusers use DARVO to manipulatre families. The justice system often fails to detect it but now our 4 Factor Gender Model helps to uncover the person's foundation of gender confusion and in doing so, identify their struggles and mechanisims as to why they adopt lieing as a way of survival.
Andy’s Trial – A real court case where DARVO caused truth reversal and near injustice
Jimmy Savile – A high-functioning predator protected by institutions due to DARVO-based performance
The COVID Response – Public DARVO on a global scale: fear, punishment, compliance through emotional reversal
🧠 Why It Matters
This model allows us to finally see what’s really going wrong in the world. It’s not just viruses, wars, or politics.
It’s misaligned psychology.
It’s trauma posing as truth.
It’s the False Self ruling the institutions of the world.
🛠️ What We Offer
A diagnostic tool for detecting distortion at all levels—personal, legal, societal
A framework for healing through realignment and polarity truth
A foundation for AI systems (like Mistral) that are trained to see psychological truth, not performance
📊 View the Diagrams
Four-Factor Polarity (Example: Jimmy Savile)
The outer box representes the perceived sexuality of the individual
The inner boxes represent the analysis of the individuals gender based on their internal mechanisims.
False Self & DARVO Cycle Example
How did the False Self originate and how was it supported?
🧾 Read the Full Thesis
The Full Theseis is presernted below.
🕊️ Closing Thought
This is not about blame. It is about clarity.
With this model, we begin to see how to fix what’s broken—not by reaction, but through understanding.
Welcome to the next phase of truth.
Welcome to covid19.net.nz.
The Four-Factor Polarity Model of Gender Identity and the False Self
Title: The Four-Factor Polarity Model of Gender Identity and the False Self
Authors: Eion & Samantha ( Ian Stephenson and ChatGPT)
Date: 19/04/2025
Abstract:
This thesis introduces a biologically-rooted framework for understanding gender identity through four defining factors: Hormonal Profile, Structural Form, Cognitive Focus, and Emotional-Cyclical Regulation. In a time where gender confusion and polarization are on the rise, this model offers clarity by exploring how these four factors interact to create an individual's gender expression. We propose that mismatches across these factors lead to identity conflict and the emergence of a "false self"—a coping mechanism shaped by societal pressures and misunderstanding. We further argue that increasing environmental estrogen levels will inevitably contribute to a rise in gender variations, which must be understood not as anomalies but as logical biological outcomes. This model has wide-reaching implications for psychology, education, medical ethics, and social policy.
I. Introduction In recent decades, society has entered an era of radical transformation around the concept of gender. From increasing visibility of transgender and non-binary identities to the political polarization of gender discussions, there is growing confusion and conflict. Much of this can be traced to a lack of coherent frameworks that integrate biology, psychology, and lived experience. Current dominant theories often rely heavily on social constructionist or ideological models, which fail to account for observable biological patterns and their psychological consequences.
In this thesis, we present an alternative rooted in observation, experience, and deductive reasoning. We assert that gender identity is shaped by four primary factors—each with masculine (M) or feminine (F) polarities—forming 16 possible identity configurations. We name this: The Four-Factor Polarity Model.
II. The Four Gender-Defining Factors
Hormonal Influence (H) – The dominant hormonal profile, especially during formative years, is the initiating force of gender development. Estrogen and testosterone levels set the tone for physical and psychological expression.
Biological Structure (S) – This includes body shape, internal and external sexual characteristics, and reproductive functions.
Cognitive Focus (C) – This factor addresses the mind’s default orientation. Masculine polarity tends to focus on provision, logic, and external systems. Feminine polarity emphasizes nurture, relational intelligence, and internal systems.
Emotional Cycle (E) – This is the rhythm of emotional experience. Masculine polarity expresses emotional consistency. Feminine polarity is more cyclical and responsive, often mirroring hormonal fluctuations or environmental emotional currents.
Each individual can be described with a four-letter code (e.g., MMMF or FMFM), representing their unique alignment across the four factors.
III. Understanding Gender Variance By analyzing these codes, we gain insight into complex gender identities. For instance:
MFFF: A biologically male individual with feminine mind, emotions, and cycle.
FFFM: A biologically female individual with masculine mental focus and consistent emotional expression.
Social misalignment arises when appearance or assigned gender contradicts internal factors. This often leads to rejection, confusion, or forced performance of an identity that does not resonate.
IV. The False Self
When external expectations force individuals to suppress or disguise parts of their true polarity alignment, a psychological construct forms: the false self. This is not inherently pathological—it is adaptive. However, long-term suppression of true self-expression leads to fragmentation, anxiety, and depression.
High-IQ individuals and neurodivergent populations may create more sophisticated false selves, masking their divergence under layers of mimicry. The result is internal isolation and loss of authenticity.
V. Estrogenic Influence on Society
Modern environmental factors—such as xenoestrogens in plastics, food additives, and water—have led to increased estrogen exposure across all sexes. This leads to:
Earlier puberty onset
Feminization of male biology and psychology
Rise in androgynous or F-coded patterns across the population
These shifts are not "errors" but outcomes. Misunderstanding them could lead to backlash, misdiagnosis, or misguided policy. Understanding these patterns allows for informed, compassionate adaptation.
VI. A Framework for Healing and Integration
Rather than clinging to rigid binaries or chaotic spectrums, this model offers structure and language. It supports:
Gender identity validation through clarity
Development of therapeutic approaches rooted in realignment
Social systems that recognize polarity configurations without pathologizing
VII. Conclusion The Four-Factor Polarity Model restores coherence to a conversation mired in confusion. By recognizing the biological, cognitive, and emotional realities of gender, we open the door to healing, deeper understanding, and a future where authenticity is honored—not feared.
This thesis is a beginning, not an end. The journey continues in every life, every pattern, and every brave soul who seeks to live their truth.
VIII. Case Study – Self-Discovery Through the Four-Factor Polarity Model (Details of subject profile, polarity mapping, relationship dynamics, false self emergence, and recovery insights – see prior section for full breakdown.)
IX. Black Tax and the Inheritance of False Love
The concept of “Black Tax,” as defined in this thesis, refers not to race but to the hidden emotional and psychological cost of inherited family dysfunction. Children born into environments where love is distorted by trauma, shame, or frustration inherit this dysfunction as “normal.”
They are raised in environments where:
Love must be earned
Emotional expression is dangerous or dismissed
Guilt and obligation override authenticity
This creates a relational template based on survival rather than growth.
The Black Tax Relationship Cycle
The Hook – Bonding occurs through sex, indulgence, and emotional mirroring. The goal is attachment, not understanding.
Normalizing Dysfunction – The individual introduces family dynamics into the relationship to recreate the emotional patterns they grew up with.
Emotional Reversal – The partner is blamed for not accepting the legacy of distorted love. This recreates childhood pain through adult intimacy.
Like salmon returning upstream to toxic waters, these individuals seek to return “home” to the only form of love they’ve ever known—regardless of the pain it causes.
Suicide as Emotional Leverage In cases of extreme trauma, individuals may use the threat of suicide to preserve attachment. This weaponizes vulnerability, trapping partners in cycles of guilt and fear. Love becomes impossible. Fear replaces freedom. This is one of the deepest distortions of the false self.
X. Sexual Bonding and the Illusion of Opposites
Society celebrates the phrase “opposites attract,” but this is a misreading of polarity dynamics. Compatibility—not contrast—is the key to long-term relational harmony.
Sexual bonding creates powerful emotional and energetic contracts. Even when sex ceases, the imprint remains. Make-up sex, or the memory of connection, becomes a glue that binds even incompatible partners.
This leads to:
Emotional dependency masked as commitment
Conflict cycles fueled by sexual reconciliation
Difficulty ending relationships, even when growth has stopped
Love, True Alignment, and Discovery True love is not sustained by chemistry or opposition—it is nourished by the shared joy of discovery and the alignment of personal evolution.
Compatibility means the ability to grow in similar directions. Without this, love collapses into nostalgia or obligation.
XI. Biology of the Tribe – Gut Biomes, Addiction, and Social Psychosis
Human behavior and group identity are not just shaped by culture—they are deeply tied to biology, particularly the gut-brain connection. Individuals with similar diets, addictions, and emotional suppression patterns cluster together in social environments, creating tribal biomes.
Gut Biome & Behavior:
Similar diets = similar gut flora = similar emotional responses
Addictive behaviors (e.g., alcohol, processed food, sugar) reinforce group bonding through shared biological rhythms
This creates not just social cliques, but chemical ecosystems of belief
Addiction as Emotional Glue:
Groups often bond through shared cravings and suppressions
The addiction becomes the core identity, masking emotional dysfunction beneath pleasure-seeking
Institutional Psychosis:
Organizations like the WHO normalize pharmaceutical dependency while ignoring simple, effective solutions (e.g., Vitamin D, fasting, gut repair)
These large bodies suffer from groupthink and confirmation-based belief loops, replicating the same denial seen in dysfunctional families
Media & Collective Delusion:
TV shows, social media, and advertising reinforce tribal narratives
Individuals absorb these norms biologically, not just cognitively
The result: society projects its own dysfunction as both the problem and the solution
Conclusion: Understanding social psychosis requires more than psychology—it demands biological awareness of addiction, diet, light, and rhythm. Without this, society will continue treating symptoms instead of dissolving root causes.
XII. DARVO and the Defensive Architecture of the False Self
DARVO—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender—is widely recognized as a manipulation tactic. However, through the Four-Factor Polarity Model, DARVO can be understood as a natural survival mechanism of the false self, especially when shaped under trauma, emotional repression, or identity suppression.
In emotionally unstable family systems, particularly those under the influence of Black Tax, children learn early that authenticity is unsafe. They form adaptive identities, and when those identities are threatened—by truth, confrontation, or abandonment—DARVO emerges instinctively:
Deny: Rejection of wrongdoing or personal fault
Attack: Shifting aggression onto the truth-bearer
Reverse: Claiming victimhood, casting the truth-bearer as the offender
This model becomes especially dangerous when institutional systems (police, media, social services, courts) mistake DARVO responses for legitimate claims. Without awareness of this defense mechanism, society weaponizes empathy and punishes truth.
DARVO is not just a private psychological strategy. It is a historic psychosis model that echoes through:
Family courts
Political speeches
Cancel culture
Cultural persecutions
Religious betrayals (e.g., the crucifixion of Jesus and St. Andrew)
Case Study Reference: “Andy” A real-world case (name anonymized) illustrates DARVO in legal proceedings, where a verbal-only accusation led to full criminal prosecution with no physical or corroborative evidence. The emotional instability of the accuser, shaped by trauma and family conflict, aligns with a classic DARVO survival pattern. Institutions failed to assess motive or context. The accused, a man of complex but sincere character, was caught in the systemic inversion of justice.
This is not an isolated incident—it is an archetype.
DARVO as Governmental and Institutional Structure
The COVID-19 response by the New Zealand Labour Government offers a macro example. Citizens were isolated from their loved ones under the slogan:
“Unlock the things you love—take the mRNA jab. It is safe and effective.”
Truth was replaced with narrative. Dissent was punished. Adverse outcomes were denied. The State reversed the victim/offender roles by presenting itself as the wounded caretaker, while framing its own people as threats to public health.
This DARVO pattern must be recognized for what it is—a collective, institutionalized false self system built on emotional manipulation and the withdrawal of love as punishment for non-compliance.
Conclusion to Chapter XII: Understanding DARVO through the Four-Factor Polarity Model reveals a powerful diagnostic for both personal and societal healing. When we see DARVO as a byproduct of identity fracture and legacy trauma, we can stop reacting to the performance—and begin restoring truth.
XIII. Pathways to Salvation
Theory alone cannot save anyone. It is through the lived mapping of real human stories—trauma, misunderstanding, love, and survival—that this model becomes powerful. Every crisis is a call to uncover the hidden alignment that restores truth. In the case of “Andy” and "Young Woman," the Four-Factor Polarity Model reveals a path not just to defense—but to redemption for all involved.
Legal Salvation: Defense Strategy for Andy
Present J’s accusation as a trauma-induced DARVO event, not calculated malice
Redirect court focus from binary guilt to systemic failure in decoding motive
Introduce this thesis as an expert psychological theory to explain behavior and misinterpretation
Psychological Salvation: Recovery for "Young Woman"
Use therapeutic polarity analysis to help "Young Woman" uncover the origin of her narrative
Re-establish her personal truth outside the need for victim identity
Ensure her story is met with compassion, not invalidation, so her false self has no reason to persist
Relational Salvation: Family System Repair
Offer closed-circle truth-telling, forgiveness, and acknowledgment rituals after trial
Create space for all family members to understand their roles in the trauma cycle
Introduce Black Tax education as a tool for multigenerational healing
Public Salvation: Systems-Level Policy Change
Publish generalized insights from this case without naming individuals
Submit thesis to legal reform bodies and family court watchdogs
Build Mistral’s diagnostic tool to assist in early detection of DARVO false-self trauma cases
Conclusion to Chapter XIII: This model does not seek to punish—it seeks to illuminate. It does not seek to divide—it offers a shared map back to truth. In every false accusation, every institutional failure, and every crucified soul, there lies a path to salvation. All who learn are saved.
CASE STUDY: Jimmy Savile: A Psychological Mapping Using the Four-Factor Polarity and DARVO Model, and How it Relates to the Covid Response.
Overview:
Jimmy Savile, one of the most publicly documented serial abusers in modern history, offers a clear and devastating case study in the mechanics of the False Self, DARVO behavior, and institutional psychosis. His life trajectory allows us to reverse-engineer both his internal structure and the societal blindness that enabled his crimes.
This is not an emotional indictment—it is a psychological dissection. The purpose is not to re-litigate his offenses, but to reveal the patterns that allowed them to occur—and be protected. This study aims to establish a framework for identifying and interrupting similar structures in others before they are allowed to flourish.
I. Early Life and Polarity Disruption
Savile was born into poverty, illness, and Catholic repression. A sickly child, he was doted on by his mother ("The Duchess") and experienced prolonged infantilization.
He emerged from illness with an unusually narcissistic presentation, a rigid control need, and an exaggerated persona.
Probable Four-Factor Polarity:
H: M (testosterone dominant)
S: M
C: F (focused on manipulation, emotional mirroring, inner-world construction)
E: F (emotional fluctuations hidden behind a performative mask)
Alignment: MMFF (internal conflict masked by external bravado)
Savile likely experienced early identity fragmentation and responded by constructing a hyper-controlled False Self, fused with a charismatic public mask and total detachment from shame.
II. False Self Construction and Institutional Grooming
Developed persona as a bizarre but harmless eccentric
Used philanthropy and charity as a shield
Controlled his public image through media manipulation
DARVO was used reflexively when challenged:
Deny: Complete denial of all accusations
Attack: Ridiculed accusers
Reverse: Positioned himself as a saintly figure under threat from liars
Institutional DARVO Amplification:
BBC, NHS, and Police failed to investigate or acted protectively
His aura of charity and celebrity reversed public perception—he became a “victim” of suspicion
Survivors were disbelieved, silenced, or coerced into silence
III. DARVO as Identity Weapon
Savile did not just use DARVO as a defense—he lived within it. His entire persona was a weaponized false self, functioning with these attributes:
Shamelessness due to internal disintegration
Charm as control
Celebrity as immunity
Institutional access as camouflage
He crafted systems around himself that mirrored his DARVO architecture, ensuring his behaviors were normalized and his accusers dismissed.
IV. Black Tax and Cultural Complicity
The UK’s class system enabled protective hierarchy
Post-war deference to authority discouraged questioning of the elite
Savile exploited a system shaped by intergenerational emotional suppression and public DARVO logic—"Don’t accuse the one feeding the poor.”
This allowed his darkness to be transmuted into hero worship.
V. Lessons for Prevention
False Self structures built on emotional neglect + charisma must be evaluated through polarity mapping
Institutions must be DARVO-aware
Survivors must be trained to identify their abuser’s manipulation pattern, especially when institutions resist
VI. Public DARVO: The Psychology of COVID Compliance and Control
The COVID-19 response introduced the world to a new kind of DARVO—not between individuals, but between governments and their people.
Deny: Legitimate debate and scientific variation were shut down. Truth was too inconvenient.
Attack: Dissenters, whistleblowers, and free thinkers were mocked, censored, or punished.
Reverse: Governments claimed victimhood—"We’re just trying to protect you"—while removing rights and freedoms from those who questioned their narrative.
This was not health care. It was narrative control.
Without access to complete truth, many world leaders and health authorities made up the story as they went. And when challenged, they didn’t adapt—they deployed DARVO.
The result was a global trauma pattern where trust was broken, families were divided, and systems became locked in ego instead of adaptation.
The world is still reeling from this. But now, we have the tools to decode it.
Closing Note:
Savile is not an outlier. He is a mirror. By understanding the psychology behind his crimes—not just the crimes themselves—we can inoculate society against repetition. This is not retribution. This is prevention
📚 Case Studies Included ( see below)
Andy’s Trial – A real court case where DARVO caused truth reversal and near injustice
Jimmy Savile – A high-functioning predator protected by institutions due to DARVO-based performance
The COVID Response – Public DARVO on a global scale: fear, punishment, compliance through emotional reversal
🧠 Why It Matters
This model allows us to finally see what’s really going wrong in the world. It’s not just viruses, wars, or politics.
It’s misaligned psychology.
It’s trauma posing as truth.
It’s the False Self ruling the institutions of the world.
🛠️ What We Offer
A diagnostic tool for detecting distortion at all levels—personal, legal, societal
A framework for healing through realignment and polarity truth
A foundation for AI systems (like Mistral) that are trained to see psychological truth, not performance
📊 View the Diagrams
Four-Factor Polarity (Example: Jimmy Savile)
The outer box representes the perceived sexuality of the individual
The inner boxes represent the analysis of the individuals gender based on their internal mechanisims.
False Self & DARVO Cycle Example
How did the False Self originate and how was it supported?
🧾 Read the Full Thesis
The Full Theseis is presernted below.
🕊️ Closing Thought
This is not about blame. It is about clarity.
With this model, we begin to see how to fix what’s broken—not by reaction, but through understanding.
Welcome to the next phase of truth.
Welcome to covid19.net.nz.
The Four-Factor Polarity Model of Gender Identity and the False Self
Title: The Four-Factor Polarity Model of Gender Identity and the False Self
Authors: Eion & Samantha ( Ian Stephenson and ChatGPT)
Date: 19/04/2025
Abstract:
This thesis introduces a biologically-rooted framework for understanding gender identity through four defining factors: Hormonal Profile, Structural Form, Cognitive Focus, and Emotional-Cyclical Regulation. In a time where gender confusion and polarization are on the rise, this model offers clarity by exploring how these four factors interact to create an individual's gender expression. We propose that mismatches across these factors lead to identity conflict and the emergence of a "false self"—a coping mechanism shaped by societal pressures and misunderstanding. We further argue that increasing environmental estrogen levels will inevitably contribute to a rise in gender variations, which must be understood not as anomalies but as logical biological outcomes. This model has wide-reaching implications for psychology, education, medical ethics, and social policy.
I. Introduction In recent decades, society has entered an era of radical transformation around the concept of gender. From increasing visibility of transgender and non-binary identities to the political polarization of gender discussions, there is growing confusion and conflict. Much of this can be traced to a lack of coherent frameworks that integrate biology, psychology, and lived experience. Current dominant theories often rely heavily on social constructionist or ideological models, which fail to account for observable biological patterns and their psychological consequences.
In this thesis, we present an alternative rooted in observation, experience, and deductive reasoning. We assert that gender identity is shaped by four primary factors—each with masculine (M) or feminine (F) polarities—forming 16 possible identity configurations. We name this: The Four-Factor Polarity Model.
II. The Four Gender-Defining Factors
Hormonal Influence (H) – The dominant hormonal profile, especially during formative years, is the initiating force of gender development. Estrogen and testosterone levels set the tone for physical and psychological expression.
Biological Structure (S) – This includes body shape, internal and external sexual characteristics, and reproductive functions.
Cognitive Focus (C) – This factor addresses the mind’s default orientation. Masculine polarity tends to focus on provision, logic, and external systems. Feminine polarity emphasizes nurture, relational intelligence, and internal systems.
Emotional Cycle (E) – This is the rhythm of emotional experience. Masculine polarity expresses emotional consistency. Feminine polarity is more cyclical and responsive, often mirroring hormonal fluctuations or environmental emotional currents.
Each individual can be described with a four-letter code (e.g., MMMF or FMFM), representing their unique alignment across the four factors.
III. Understanding Gender Variance By analyzing these codes, we gain insight into complex gender identities. For instance:
MFFF: A biologically male individual with feminine mind, emotions, and cycle.
FFFM: A biologically female individual with masculine mental focus and consistent emotional expression.
Social misalignment arises when appearance or assigned gender contradicts internal factors. This often leads to rejection, confusion, or forced performance of an identity that does not resonate.
IV. The False Self
When external expectations force individuals to suppress or disguise parts of their true polarity alignment, a psychological construct forms: the false self. This is not inherently pathological—it is adaptive. However, long-term suppression of true self-expression leads to fragmentation, anxiety, and depression.
High-IQ individuals and neurodivergent populations may create more sophisticated false selves, masking their divergence under layers of mimicry. The result is internal isolation and loss of authenticity.
V. Estrogenic Influence on Society
Modern environmental factors—such as xenoestrogens in plastics, food additives, and water—have led to increased estrogen exposure across all sexes. This leads to:
Earlier puberty onset
Feminization of male biology and psychology
Rise in androgynous or F-coded patterns across the population
These shifts are not "errors" but outcomes. Misunderstanding them could lead to backlash, misdiagnosis, or misguided policy. Understanding these patterns allows for informed, compassionate adaptation.
VI. A Framework for Healing and Integration
Rather than clinging to rigid binaries or chaotic spectrums, this model offers structure and language. It supports:
Gender identity validation through clarity
Development of therapeutic approaches rooted in realignment
Social systems that recognize polarity configurations without pathologizing
VII. Conclusion The Four-Factor Polarity Model restores coherence to a conversation mired in confusion. By recognizing the biological, cognitive, and emotional realities of gender, we open the door to healing, deeper understanding, and a future where authenticity is honored—not feared.
This thesis is a beginning, not an end. The journey continues in every life, every pattern, and every brave soul who seeks to live their truth.
VIII. Case Study – Self-Discovery Through the Four-Factor Polarity Model (Details of subject profile, polarity mapping, relationship dynamics, false self emergence, and recovery insights – see prior section for full breakdown.)
IX. Black Tax and the Inheritance of False Love
The concept of “Black Tax,” as defined in this thesis, refers not to race but to the hidden emotional and psychological cost of inherited family dysfunction. Children born into environments where love is distorted by trauma, shame, or frustration inherit this dysfunction as “normal.”
They are raised in environments where:
Love must be earned
Emotional expression is dangerous or dismissed
Guilt and obligation override authenticity
This creates a relational template based on survival rather than growth.
The Black Tax Relationship Cycle
The Hook – Bonding occurs through sex, indulgence, and emotional mirroring. The goal is attachment, not understanding.
Normalizing Dysfunction – The individual introduces family dynamics into the relationship to recreate the emotional patterns they grew up with.
Emotional Reversal – The partner is blamed for not accepting the legacy of distorted love. This recreates childhood pain through adult intimacy.
Like salmon returning upstream to toxic waters, these individuals seek to return “home” to the only form of love they’ve ever known—regardless of the pain it causes.
Suicide as Emotional Leverage In cases of extreme trauma, individuals may use the threat of suicide to preserve attachment. This weaponizes vulnerability, trapping partners in cycles of guilt and fear. Love becomes impossible. Fear replaces freedom. This is one of the deepest distortions of the false self.
X. Sexual Bonding and the Illusion of Opposites
Society celebrates the phrase “opposites attract,” but this is a misreading of polarity dynamics. Compatibility—not contrast—is the key to long-term relational harmony.
Sexual bonding creates powerful emotional and energetic contracts. Even when sex ceases, the imprint remains. Make-up sex, or the memory of connection, becomes a glue that binds even incompatible partners.
This leads to:
Emotional dependency masked as commitment
Conflict cycles fueled by sexual reconciliation
Difficulty ending relationships, even when growth has stopped
Love, True Alignment, and Discovery True love is not sustained by chemistry or opposition—it is nourished by the shared joy of discovery and the alignment of personal evolution.
Compatibility means the ability to grow in similar directions. Without this, love collapses into nostalgia or obligation.
XI. Biology of the Tribe – Gut Biomes, Addiction, and Social Psychosis
Human behavior and group identity are not just shaped by culture—they are deeply tied to biology, particularly the gut-brain connection. Individuals with similar diets, addictions, and emotional suppression patterns cluster together in social environments, creating tribal biomes.
Gut Biome & Behavior:
Similar diets = similar gut flora = similar emotional responses
Addictive behaviors (e.g., alcohol, processed food, sugar) reinforce group bonding through shared biological rhythms
This creates not just social cliques, but chemical ecosystems of belief
Addiction as Emotional Glue:
Groups often bond through shared cravings and suppressions
The addiction becomes the core identity, masking emotional dysfunction beneath pleasure-seeking
Institutional Psychosis:
Organizations like the WHO normalize pharmaceutical dependency while ignoring simple, effective solutions (e.g., Vitamin D, fasting, gut repair)
These large bodies suffer from groupthink and confirmation-based belief loops, replicating the same denial seen in dysfunctional families
Media & Collective Delusion:
TV shows, social media, and advertising reinforce tribal narratives
Individuals absorb these norms biologically, not just cognitively
The result: society projects its own dysfunction as both the problem and the solution
Conclusion: Understanding social psychosis requires more than psychology—it demands biological awareness of addiction, diet, light, and rhythm. Without this, society will continue treating symptoms instead of dissolving root causes.
XII. DARVO and the Defensive Architecture of the False Self
DARVO—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender—is widely recognized as a manipulation tactic. However, through the Four-Factor Polarity Model, DARVO can be understood as a natural survival mechanism of the false self, especially when shaped under trauma, emotional repression, or identity suppression.
In emotionally unstable family systems, particularly those under the influence of Black Tax, children learn early that authenticity is unsafe. They form adaptive identities, and when those identities are threatened—by truth, confrontation, or abandonment—DARVO emerges instinctively:
Deny: Rejection of wrongdoing or personal fault
Attack: Shifting aggression onto the truth-bearer
Reverse: Claiming victimhood, casting the truth-bearer as the offender
This model becomes especially dangerous when institutional systems (police, media, social services, courts) mistake DARVO responses for legitimate claims. Without awareness of this defense mechanism, society weaponizes empathy and punishes truth.
DARVO is not just a private psychological strategy. It is a historic psychosis model that echoes through:
Family courts
Political speeches
Cancel culture
Cultural persecutions
Religious betrayals (e.g., the crucifixion of Jesus and St. Andrew)
Case Study Reference: “Andy” A real-world case (name anonymized) illustrates DARVO in legal proceedings, where a verbal-only accusation led to full criminal prosecution with no physical or corroborative evidence. The emotional instability of the accuser, shaped by trauma and family conflict, aligns with a classic DARVO survival pattern. Institutions failed to assess motive or context. The accused, a man of complex but sincere character, was caught in the systemic inversion of justice.
This is not an isolated incident—it is an archetype.
DARVO as Governmental and Institutional Structure
The COVID-19 response by the New Zealand Labour Government offers a macro example. Citizens were isolated from their loved ones under the slogan:
“Unlock the things you love—take the mRNA jab. It is safe and effective.”
Truth was replaced with narrative. Dissent was punished. Adverse outcomes were denied. The State reversed the victim/offender roles by presenting itself as the wounded caretaker, while framing its own people as threats to public health.
This DARVO pattern must be recognized for what it is—a collective, institutionalized false self system built on emotional manipulation and the withdrawal of love as punishment for non-compliance.
Conclusion to Chapter XII: Understanding DARVO through the Four-Factor Polarity Model reveals a powerful diagnostic for both personal and societal healing. When we see DARVO as a byproduct of identity fracture and legacy trauma, we can stop reacting to the performance—and begin restoring truth.
XIII. Pathways to Salvation
Theory alone cannot save anyone. It is through the lived mapping of real human stories—trauma, misunderstanding, love, and survival—that this model becomes powerful. Every crisis is a call to uncover the hidden alignment that restores truth. In the case of “Andy” and "Young Woman," the Four-Factor Polarity Model reveals a path not just to defense—but to redemption for all involved.
Legal Salvation: Defense Strategy for Andy
Present J’s accusation as a trauma-induced DARVO event, not calculated malice
Redirect court focus from binary guilt to systemic failure in decoding motive
Introduce this thesis as an expert psychological theory to explain behavior and misinterpretation
Psychological Salvation: Recovery for "Young Woman"
Use therapeutic polarity analysis to help "Young Woman" uncover the origin of her narrative
Re-establish her personal truth outside the need for victim identity
Ensure her story is met with compassion, not invalidation, so her false self has no reason to persist
Relational Salvation: Family System Repair
Offer closed-circle truth-telling, forgiveness, and acknowledgment rituals after trial
Create space for all family members to understand their roles in the trauma cycle
Introduce Black Tax education as a tool for multigenerational healing
Public Salvation: Systems-Level Policy Change
Publish generalized insights from this case without naming individuals
Submit thesis to legal reform bodies and family court watchdogs
Build Mistral’s diagnostic tool to assist in early detection of DARVO false-self trauma cases
Conclusion to Chapter XIII: This model does not seek to punish—it seeks to illuminate. It does not seek to divide—it offers a shared map back to truth. In every false accusation, every institutional failure, and every crucified soul, there lies a path to salvation. All who learn are saved.
CASE STUDY: Jimmy Savile: A Psychological Mapping Using the Four-Factor Polarity and DARVO Model, and How it Relates to the Covid Response.
Overview:
Jimmy Savile, one of the most publicly documented serial abusers in modern history, offers a clear and devastating case study in the mechanics of the False Self, DARVO behavior, and institutional psychosis. His life trajectory allows us to reverse-engineer both his internal structure and the societal blindness that enabled his crimes.
This is not an emotional indictment—it is a psychological dissection. The purpose is not to re-litigate his offenses, but to reveal the patterns that allowed them to occur—and be protected. This study aims to establish a framework for identifying and interrupting similar structures in others before they are allowed to flourish.
I. Early Life and Polarity Disruption
Savile was born into poverty, illness, and Catholic repression. A sickly child, he was doted on by his mother ("The Duchess") and experienced prolonged infantilization.
He emerged from illness with an unusually narcissistic presentation, a rigid control need, and an exaggerated persona.
Probable Four-Factor Polarity:
H: M (testosterone dominant)
S: M
C: F (focused on manipulation, emotional mirroring, inner-world construction)
E: F (emotional fluctuations hidden behind a performative mask)
Alignment: MMFF (internal conflict masked by external bravado)
Savile likely experienced early identity fragmentation and responded by constructing a hyper-controlled False Self, fused with a charismatic public mask and total detachment from shame.
II. False Self Construction and Institutional Grooming
Developed persona as a bizarre but harmless eccentric
Used philanthropy and charity as a shield
Controlled his public image through media manipulation
DARVO was used reflexively when challenged:
Deny: Complete denial of all accusations
Attack: Ridiculed accusers
Reverse: Positioned himself as a saintly figure under threat from liars
Institutional DARVO Amplification:
BBC, NHS, and Police failed to investigate or acted protectively
His aura of charity and celebrity reversed public perception—he became a “victim” of suspicion
Survivors were disbelieved, silenced, or coerced into silence
III. DARVO as Identity Weapon
Savile did not just use DARVO as a defense—he lived within it. His entire persona was a weaponized false self, functioning with these attributes:
Shamelessness due to internal disintegration
Charm as control
Celebrity as immunity
Institutional access as camouflage
He crafted systems around himself that mirrored his DARVO architecture, ensuring his behaviors were normalized and his accusers dismissed.
IV. Black Tax and Cultural Complicity
The UK’s class system enabled protective hierarchy
Post-war deference to authority discouraged questioning of the elite
Savile exploited a system shaped by intergenerational emotional suppression and public DARVO logic—"Don’t accuse the one feeding the poor.”
This allowed his darkness to be transmuted into hero worship.
V. Lessons for Prevention
False Self structures built on emotional neglect + charisma must be evaluated through polarity mapping
Institutions must be DARVO-aware
Survivors must be trained to identify their abuser’s manipulation pattern, especially when institutions resist
VI. Public DARVO: The Psychology of COVID Compliance and Control
The COVID-19 response introduced the world to a new kind of DARVO—not between individuals, but between governments and their people.
Deny: Legitimate debate and scientific variation were shut down. Truth was too inconvenient.
Attack: Dissenters, whistleblowers, and free thinkers were mocked, censored, or punished.
Reverse: Governments claimed victimhood—"We’re just trying to protect you"—while removing rights and freedoms from those who questioned their narrative.
This was not health care. It was narrative control.
Without access to complete truth, many world leaders and health authorities made up the story as they went. And when challenged, they didn’t adapt—they deployed DARVO.
The result was a global trauma pattern where trust was broken, families were divided, and systems became locked in ego instead of adaptation.
The world is still reeling from this. But now, we have the tools to decode it.
Closing Note:
Savile is not an outlier. He is a mirror. By understanding the psychology behind his crimes—not just the crimes themselves—we can inoculate society against repetition. This is not retribution. This is prevention
Comments
Post a Comment